top of page
Search

The Shadow of Bill 2-25: A Reckoning for Crofton's Future

  • Writer: Kalistrana Crest-Benjamin
    Kalistrana Crest-Benjamin
  • Mar 16
  • 2 min read

A storm is brewing along the MD Route 3 corridor. It comes not in the form of rain or wind, but in legislation—Bill 2-25, a redevelopment bill poised to reshape the very fabric of Crofton and its surrounding areas. Behind closed doors and within the echoing halls of the County Council, a battle is unfolding.

The bill, originally introduced in January, is an echo of past failures—legislation that could not survive its first iteration. But it has returned, altered and restructured, with new amendments that may force Crofton’s hand. Now, with a vote scheduled for March 17, its impact looms larger than ever, and its consequences stretch far beyond its initial purpose.

Supporters claim the bill is a necessary evolution, designed to fuel redevelopment in targeted growth areas. Route 3, long designated a “Critical Corridor” in the County’s Plan 2040, stands at the center of this vision. But for those who know these roads, who feel the daily pulse of congestion and witness the failing infrastructure, a more unsettling question arises: How can this narrow, overloaded artery bear the weight of even greater density?

Rather than a county-wide transformation, Bill 2-25 selectively targets specific policy areas—Critical Economic Zones, Town Centers, Village Center Overlays, and Transit-Oriented Development sites. This is not just about redevelopment; it is a calculated reshaping of Crofton’s identity. The bill’s amendments to commercial districts would pave the way for high-density residential development—duplexes, quadruplexes, multi-family dwellings, and stacked townhouses.

If passed, this bill will take effect alongside the Housing Attainability Act, an ominous pairing that may forever alter the landscape of Route 3. The road, already strained to its breaking point, will become the fault line of this transformation.

Within the council chambers, the resistance is mounting. Councilwoman Leadbetter of District 7 has fought to carve out protections, wielding amendments like a blade to excise vulnerable areas from the bill’s reach. Her first amendment successfully removed the “South County” regions from the bill’s grasp. But her second, more desperate attempt—to erase the MD Route 3 Critical Corridor entirely from the provisions—fell short, failing by a narrow margin.

Now, the fate of Crofton’s future hangs in the balance. The red line of Route 3, drawn on maps and whispered in council discussions, marks more than a stretch of highway. It marks a crossroads—a choice between unchecked expansion and the preservation of what Crofton was meant to be.

The vote is coming. The reckoning is near. And when the dust settles, Crofton will either stand firm or become something unrecognizable.


 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page